What Philosophy and Art History Can Teach Us About the Lovers Card

The Jean Dodal Lovers card, 1701

The Lovers Card

In my class, Symbolism of the Tarot Trumps: Through the Eyes of the Artists, I spent a lot of time on the Lovers card. It seems that this card, in particular, illustrates the profound theme that is found in the trumps. It also illustrates the failure of the occultists who associated the Tarot’s trumps with Hebrew letters and Kabbalistic correspondents to appreciate that theme.

From the time I first became involved in the Tarot in the 1980s, I have been fascinated by this card as it appears in the Tarot of Marseille. The Marseille card depicts a male lover standing between two women, suggesting that he needs to make a choice. In some versions the drawing is crude, and at first, I was not sure the second woman was a woman. The figure might have been a priest performing a marriage. Barbara Walker in her book on the Tarot stated that it was a woman performing a marriage. But after viewing many early decks, especially the Jean Noblet (the earliest example, from 1650) it became clear that the lover must make a choice between a woman with flowers in her hair, representing sensuality or one wearing a laurel wreath representing virtue.

This insight was verified by another historic example. The title page of Triompho di Fortuna, by Fanti, a 1527 Venetian book on divination with dice and astrology, depicts the pope sitting on top of the globe. The signs of the zodiac form a belt around the globe and there are crank handles extending from both sides. On the left an angel, known as Bona Fortuna, tries to turn the handle clockwise, and on the right a devil, known as Mala Fortuna, tries to turn his handle counterclockwise. Two women sit next to the pope with their names written above. On the angel’s side, sits Virtus, Latin for virtue, and on the Devil’s side, sits Voluptas, Latin for pleasure or sensuality. The pope’s fate depends on his choice. 

Further research uncovered that this theme can be traced to the Iliad, in the 8th century BC. Before the hero of the Iliad, Achilles, could decide on joining the siege of Troy, he asked his mother, the sea nymph Thetis for advice she told him that he had a choice of two fates: either he can die a young and glorious death at Troy and his name will be remembered forever, or he can stay home and live a long sensual but unremarkable life and his name will be forgotten. He goes to Troy.

In Platonic philosophy the human soul is believed to be composed of a hierarchy with three parts: the soul of Eros, which longs for personal pleasure; the soul of Thymos, which takes on challenges or hardships for the sake of ideals; and the soul of Logos, which exhibits greater wisdom and judgement. Achilles’s choice illustrates that he is guided by Thymos not Eros

The Choice of Hercules, Girolamo di Benvennuto, c 1500

A similar story was told about the Classical hero Hercules. In Xenophon’s 4th century BC Greek parable, the young Hercules is offered a choice between a life of vice presented by Kakia, the amoral goddess, or of virtue presented by Arete, the goddess of virtue. In other words, he was offered a life of selfish pleasure or one of hardship and honor. He chose Arete, accomplished his famous twelve labors, and became immortal. The image of the young Hercules standing between the two goddesses became a popular theme in Renaissance art and continued into the 19th century. Various artists created variations on this theme with an everyman figure standing in for Hercules. The Tarot of Marseille Lovers card is one example. The title page of the Triompho di Fortuna is another. One entertaining version was painted by Joshua Reynolds, in 1760. It depicts the actor David Garrick standing between two women who represent Comedy and Tragedy. An engraved rendering of the painting was used as the title card for one of the first oracle decks, Hooper’s Conversational Cards, for 1775.

The choice of Hercules – Giovanni de Min – 1512 Venice
Joshua Reynolds, The actor David Garrick between Comedy and Tragedy, 1760-61

Starting with the Eliphes Levi in the 1850s, occultists began associating the twenty-two trump cards in the Tarot with the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet and their Kabbalistic celestial correspondents. Levi started by assigning the first letter aleph to the Magician. So, the Lovers was assigned to the sixth letter vau and the constellation Taurus. Most of his followers followed this assignment, but some chose Sagittarius or Virgo. The Golden Dawn started by assigning aleph to the Fool and the Lovers to the seventh letter zain and the constellation Gemini. Gemini at least represents duality, but none of these associations has anything to do with the actual theme of the card, a theme that has been part of Western philosophy and art for around 2,600 years.      

About Robert M Place

I am an illustrator and author best known for creating the Alchemical Tarot and the Tarot of the Sevenfold Mystery and writing The Tarot: History, Symbolism, and Divination.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What Philosophy and Art History Can Teach Us About the Lovers Card

  1. Aaron says:

    As I understand it, Gemini is not about duality but about the intellectual capacity to integrate two differing aspects of reality at the same time. After the assertion of individual ego in Aries, and the drive to then sustain and ground that ego in Taurus, Gemini is the initial stage of integrating those two somewhat opposite tendencies: egoistic expanse and stable grounding. In that system, Gemini is ruled by Mercury, the Magician, while Aries is ruled by mars and Taurus by Venus. The implication being that the intellectual capacity and flexibility of Mercury, personified through the lovers card, can integrate the energies of Mars and Venus. So perhaps the astrological assignment is closer to your interpretation than you realize. Ultimately the theme is discernment.

    • This still has nothing to with the history of the image. I find that a lot of the astrological assignments can be force fit through creative reasoning, but this has nothing to do with the reason artists developed the picture.

Leave a Reply to AaronCancel reply